Talk Movies To Me

Author

Elliot Morris

Elliot Morris has 30 articles published.

Elliot enjoys movies with fedoras and sombreros. When he's not watching movies, he is walking his dog, eating sushi, or checking out some recordings of 70s Brazilian music or 90s electronica. Elliot has a Masters degree in English & American literature from New York University.

‘Candyman’ is Eerie, Bold, and Worth Your Time

in Reviews by

Admit it. You did it as a kid: you looked in the mirror, turned off the lights, and attempted to summon Bloody Mary by chanting her name X amount of times, or some variation of this. How these urban legends spread from town to town throughout the ages is a subject for another time. And while we might look back on those childish rituals as somewhat goofy and hokey, there was a hint of fear in the form of “what if?” as a child. What if Bloody Mary did appear? What would we do? 1992’s Candyman imagines a frightening and violent world where similar events do in fact occur. 

Virginia Madsen plays UIC graduate student Helen Lyle. She is studying urban legends and monster myths and Candyman is the subject of her research. According to the film, he is a supernatural being who terrorizes a housing complex on the North side of Chicago. He lures people with candy and has a bloody hook for a hand. He also has a strange association with bees and some of the more frightening sequences revolve around this association.

Helen, along with her partner Bernie have a theory that myths like this never pan out, and that they have a rational explanation. As they investigate the latest incident of a Candyman-related murder, they have an increasingly difficult time explaining it away. As the film goes on, we’re not quite sure where it’s headed: is there an actual human being masquerading as a folktale? Or is he an actual boogeyman, existing on the fear of humans? The film explores the idea of belief in the supernatural in a surprisingly refreshing way. What role does belief play in urban legends? In scary stories? In our imaginations? These myths and legends stem from real fears. Fears that lurk in our parks, our schools, our bathrooms, or in this case, broken down apartment buildings in Chicago.

Jordan Peele has written a “spiritual sequel” to the film, which is set to be released in June 2020. He has been trusted to not gloss over the racial issues found in the original. And yes, Todd Taylor is returning to reprise his role as the titular Candyman. But make sure you see this so when your friends ask about the new one, you can say, “Well, in the original…”

I mostly enjoyed this film. It has a certain sense of “indie-horror” that I think works to its benefit. It also is more of a slow burn than I had anticipated. I think this screenplay with a larger budget, huge stars and studio influence would be quite different. But because the story and the names attached weren’t huge at the time, they had to be a bit more economical with what they had. If you’re in the mood for a slower (but still gory) horror film, I’d recommend it. Its brooding atmosphere will surely unsettle viewers as they discover it this Halloween.

Soderbergh’s First Netflix Film Soars Above Most Offerings

in Reviews by

Erick Scott, the #1 draft pick in the NBA sits across from his agent, Ray. The NBA is in the middle of a lockout, resulting in no salary for the rookie-to-be. Erick (Melvin Gregg) has taken out a loan to get by while the owners and players work things out. Ray (Andre Holland) is lecturing him on the idiocy of this loan, talking about financial discipline and personal responsibility. If there is no money for Erick, there is no money for Ray, as evidenced by the decline of his company credit card at this fancy New York restaurant. This leads Ray to devising a plan to explore the labor politics of the National Basketball Association.

Ray goes from restaurants to offices to gyms to a sauna in order to get the wheels turning in his master plan. I could explain his plan here and it wouldn’t be a terrible spoiler, but it would spoil the fun of watching the narrative unravel in this sleek, 90-minute drama. Ray is determined. He meets with one of his bosses (Zachary Quinto), the commissioner of the NBA (Kyle MacLachlan), the rep for the players association (Sonja Sohn), and a player-turned-youth-coach (Bill Duke). There are real interviews with actual NBA stars laced throughout the film. Karl-Anthony Towns, Reggie Jackson, and Donovan Mitchell offer their insights into the NBA lifestyle as a young player. The focus of this “sports” movie is not on the game of basketball itself, but the “game above the game.”

Positioned between contracts, TV deals, endorsements, and players rights, the screenplay (written by Moonlight’s scribe Tarell Alvin McCraney) navigates the fast-paced sophistication of the money side of the NBA flawlessly. It’s sharp; the dialogue is quick and loaded, so you best not be scrolling through your phone while watching this one. The plot develops quickly, yet doesn’t reveal everything up front, allowing for the viewers to speculate until all is made clear.  Holland is perfect for the role as Ray, the dogged and determined sports agent who more-or-less looks to cause an earthquake in the sports world.

It’s easy to see what was attractive about this project to Steven Soderbergh (besides working with his The Knick colleague, Andre Holland): it’s a story about independence; about autonomy of the individual and seeking to alter, disrupt, or break from current systems. Whether it’s a marriage, a government, or the NBA, Soderbergh’s characters crave independence, and they have unconventional methods of claiming it. That’s not to say they’re always successful or whether they are right or wrong, Soderbergh is here to provoke thought and contemplation. This is largely due to the aforementioned screenplay. The audience is not bashed over the head zealous overtones, rather the ideas of race, class, labor, and idealism are there just enough to be clear and present, allowing the audience to digest it on their terms.

High Flying Bird was shot on an iPhone, which shouldn’t be as mind-blowing as it is considering this is Soderbergh’s second film shot on an iPhone. But I am in awe with what Soderbergh is able to accomplish. This has got to be inspiring to filmmakers of any age at any stage in their career.

In an uncanny way, the plot at the center of “High Flying Bird” mirrors Netflix’s own path to what it has become. Why does it have to play by the rules? Why can’t it carve out its own fortune (i.e. original programming)? “High Flying Bird” is not only of the best films from Netflix’s original programming, but one of the best films of the year.

Soderbergh’s Debut Showcases His Singular Talent

in Reviews by

There are a lot of points one could hit while reviewing Steven Soderbergh’s debut film. There’s the fact that a 26-year old Soderbergh wrote the screenplay in 8 days on a legal pad while driving across the country.  We could talk about how it won the audience award at Sundance, the Palme d’Or at Cannes, how it grossed over $36 million on its budget of $1.8 million, or how just 17 year after its release it was added to the United States Library of Congress’ National Film Registry. The film garnered Soderbergh his first Academy Award nomination and launched his diverse and prolific career. So let’s look back at the film that made the man, sex, lies, and videotape.

John and Ann (Peter Gallagher and Andie MacDowell) live in the muggy south–Baton Rouge to be more specific. They’re married but no longer have sex, which Ann is more or less okay with. Little does she know that John is having an affair with Ann’s sister. Ann’s naive world view is challenged when Graham (James Spader), a college friend of John’s, shows up. He is friendly, but has an aura of intelligence and mystery that gives reason for caution as well as intrigue.

Ann learns that Graham is impotent. As a way to exert power, or experience of semblance of connection, Graham records women talking about their sex lives. His hobby becomes an immediate interest to everyone who learns about it, often spurring change. The film explores Graham’s impact on John, Ann, and anyone else he comes in contact with. Spader’s performance is immaculate. He plays Graham with such precision that it’s hard to think of any other way he could have been portrayed. And this is made easier by MacDowell and Gallagher’s performance. It’s easy to imagine this film as a play for serious, heavy-hitting actors. Soderbergh cast these actors at the right time in their careers; they were familiar faces, but not enough to be distracting.

The plot sounds too simple: mysterious character arrives into a small town, upending the lives of everyone he becomes involved with. Conversation is the driving force here. The anecdotes, the irony, the subtle jabs–somehow Soderbergh hooks the audience with somewhat minute conversations that really help the audience understand the characters. Every word, gesture, and moment of silence is carefully placed. It’s the kind of thing that only a cohesive and trusting relationship between actors and director can provide. It’s also something only a confident filmmaker could pull off.  The film has a narrative, yes. But perhaps more so, it’s a series of interactions woven together.

Secrets, deception, pasts, and futures are all present in this smart and smooth talkie. It’s a film that will reward revisits as viewers pick up on the nuances beneath the surface. Whether you are talking about the impact of this film or what actually happens in the film, it’s bound to ignite some conversation.

When the Berlin Wall fell in April of ‘89, East Germans crossed over to West Germany and saw that movie theatres were playing an American film titled sex, lies, and videotape. I can only imagination their reaction when they realized it was not some sort of sex thriller, but instead were met with a heady, smart, crisp film with an incredible screenplay.

Love, Gender, and Old Time Religion in ‘David and Bathsheba’

in Reviews by

In most cases, the book is better than the movie. But what about stories adapted from the Holy Bible? In the case of adapting stories from the Bible, filmmakers and writers need to fill in the gaps, often with filler that reflects the time period in which they were made. David and Bathsheba tells the famous story of King David from the Old Testament. This film has the look, budget, and glitz that many of these Biblical epics have. I was delighted to see some philosophical nuance in Henry King’s 1951 film that was nominated for 5 Oscars.

You probably remember the gist of King David’s coveting of his neighbor’s wife, but let’s recap in case it’s been a while since you studied the good book. King David, the one who slayed Goliath, is ruling over Israel when he spots an attractive woman bathing on her rooftop. He inquires of her marital status and finds that she is married to Uriah, a soldier in David’s army. David summons her and the two are immediately attracted to each other. They know they would be breaking the Law of Moses if they were to engage in an extramarital affair. Well, they decide to shoot first and ask questions later, meaning, Bathsheba becomes pregnant with David’s child (Uriah is on the battlefront). In order to avoid a Jerry Springer-type confrontation, David concocts a plan to summon Uriah back home so he can sleep with Bathsheba and mask the pregnancy. Well, Uriah doesn’t end up sleeping with her, so David just sends him to the front line of battle and waits for reports of his death.

Bathsheba bathing on the rooftop.

Once Uriah is reported dead, David and Bathsheba are married, spurring outcries from his subjects that they are dissatisfied with his leadership and would rather have his sons rule. Following a drought in Israel, David’s and Bathsheba’s baby dies. Nathan, a prophet, tells David that God is not happy with his sin. He will not die as the law demands, but he will be punished through misfortune in his family. David takes responsibility but does what he can to protect Bathsheba. This does not sit well with the people of Israel; they want Bathsheba killed. David makes plans to save Bathsheba, but she tells David she is not blameless. David informs Bathsheba she won’t die and is willing to accept God’s justice. Now repentant, David has some flashbacks to his youth where he was anointed by Samuel and his battle with Goliath. King David then feels rain fall on his dry hands.

As I mentioned, the film does a good job of filling in the gaps that aren’t necessarily written clearly in the original text. For example, King David’s wife Michel makes it clear that David doesn’t care about anyone but himself. Ideas of love and relationships are explored more fully than I expected. The dynamics between David, his wife, and his mistress is on full display here. The camera hones in on David when his eyes land on Bathsheba. His gaze is fixed and unwavering, letting us know how determined he is to meet her.

Following his stalking, Bathsheba is portrayed as an agent in this affair. She notes that David can’t seem to find a woman that pleases him. She sets herself up so they run into each other. She desires to know exactly where he stands, saying if they are to break the Law of Moses, she must know what’s in his heart. She’s contemplative before she goes through with it. She wants a sense of surety with what she’s about to do. This parlays into an undying devotion to David. She promises that she will never run away, stating that all she wants to do is please him. In that regard, she falls into the stereotype of a doting female whose purpose is to serve her man. At once, she is an agent who takes action; she is not acted upon. But once she acts and creates change, she becomes subservient.

Absolute power corrupts absolutely is on full display here. David’s power allows him to manipulate what he sees as pawns in his game of chess. He gets what he wants at every turn…until he doesn’t. As his demands are met, David quite literally turns away from the people he is supposed to be serving. He even grows a beard (gasp!), shedding his clean cut image and opting for a more rugged look, signaling a moral descent. In fact, David is shown in such a poor light, that when the film was released, there were protests in Singapore because the Muslim community, who revere David as an important prophet, were upset with the film’s depiction of the King.

Gregory Peck and Susan Hayward are great as the titular characters here. Their style of acting serves the purpose of the film, and Peck in particular shows off his skills for portraying the arc of David. By the end of the film, David is repentant and has a long, long, long prayer of humility. His relationship with God is touched upon at multiple points throughout the film. It’s clear, but not cloying, where he stands at any given point in the film.

At the end of they day, I enjoyed David & Bathsheba. As always, the production value is top notch. Hollywood used to throw millions of dollars at these epics! They got some big names to act out a story that we all know too well while imbuing it with nuance and respect. If you’re looking for some old time religion on your movie screen, you can’t go wrong with this one.

Our Dispatch From Noir City’s Opening Night

in Reviews by

At the Egyptian Theatre on March 29th, the Film Noir Foundation put Noir City: Hollywood – The 21st Annual Los Angeles Festival of film Noir. Opening night was a sight to behold. With the theatre sold out, audiences watched two great films noir that pinpoint when noir started to go in a different direction. The theme for Noir City this year is noir in the 1950s, with films showcasing what a turbulent and paranoid time it was. There was an old time cop car out front for pictures, an intermission reception, and plenty of fedoras. Let’s get into the two films shown on opening night.

Trapped stars Lloyd Bridges as Tris Stewart, a counterfeiter that is offered a chance to get out of jail in order to help bring down a ring of counterfeiters and smugglers. He’s tapped by the feds to help out, but ultimately escapes and double-crosses them.  He connects with an old flame of his named Meg Dixon (played by the beautiful and tragic Barbara Payton), as well as some old acquaintances to get back in the game. Little does he know that the U.S. Treasury Office plans to stay one step ahead of him once they learn just what he’s up to. What ensues is a gritty little B-picture with crackling dialogue and a few twists.

If this sounds familiar, then you may have seen the 1947 film T-Men, an A-noir picture about counterfeiting. Apparently there was a lot of concern about fake money in the middle of the century? Trapped was made in cooperation with the Treasury Department, as shown in the beginning of the movie with a voice over of what it is that their agents actually do, initially giving the film a docudrama feel.

Payton is a knockout in her first lead role. Her sultry performance as Meg leaves little room to wonder why Tris looks her up the second he is out of the big house. The chemistry is definitely there between them. In a rather slick performance as Treasury agent John Downey, John Hoyt uses his suave side to slide into Tris’ circle. The back-and-forth, the terse lines, and even some of the action make Trapped an essential viewing for B-noir completionists. The Film Noir Foundation has a wonderful restoration; it looks fantastic on the big screen.

Richard Fleischer, the director, gives the film a good sense of place and pacing. The actors are given enough space to convincingly deliver their lines and betray one another. At this point in his early career, Fleischer was cutting his teeth on noir. He had already made Bodyguard and would go on to make Armored Car Robbery and The Narrow Margin  before he would diversify his portfolio. Trapped is a public domain film and can be found on Amazon, among other sites.

Classes could (and should) be taught on what Barbara Stanwyck did with her eyes (and the men who fell for it). The File on Thelma Jordan gives Stanwyck a lot of screen time to seduce whomever she wants–and that includes the audience!

Thelma Jordan shows up to the office of Cleve Marshall, an assistant district attorney. Amidst his drunken state, the two share a fun evening together. Cleve (Wendell Corey), a married man, continues to entertain what life with her might be like. She initially shows up to complain about burglars and prowlers, but Cleve wants to to uncover the mystery of who she is. Around this time, Thelma’s aunt is murdered. Cleve is called upon to help her. Without revealing too much, things get complicated with Thelma’s other relationship, the DA’s office, and of course, Cleve’s infatuation with Thelma. But it goes two ways. We get the sense Thelma is conflicted in her feelings and suffers emotionally at different points in the narrative.

Cleve is willing to go without his spine for a bit, willfully doing a Thelma’s bidding as he keeps his eye on the prize, which may or may not actually be there. The real star of the show, however, is Stanwyck. She is mysterious and alluring. Both Cleve and the audience want to know what’s really going on in her brain. This might not be a defining role for her, but it’s certainly not one to miss. She commits an act of violence in the final act that I won’t soon forget. Let’s just say it involves a cigarette lighter and someone’s eyeball.

Noir veteran Robert Siodomak helmed this one, cloaking it in enough shadows and doubts to give it the genuine noir feel. The File on Thelma Jordan is available to rent digitally on Amazon.

Noir City is a true gem. It brings noir to audiences around the world, shepherding lost films, restoring damaged pictures, all while showcasing one of the great art forms in cinema. If you’d like to donate to their efforts, you can do so here. Here’s a list of upcoming film noir film festivals. And here is some writing on film noir. Eddie Muller and his crew are doing some great work over at the Film Noir Foundation. I shudder to think what it would be like if we didn’t have them around.

If you’d like to learn more about Barbara Payton, check out You Must Remember This‘ podcast episode on her. It’s excellent (and quite sad).

1 2 3 6
Go to Top